Dolores River Operations Report 2005 River Season

--Carolyn Dunmire, Dolores River Action Group

On a Tuesday evening in mid-November, a group of farmers, boaters, anglers, scientists, and government officials gathered at the Dolores Community Center to review Dolores River Operations for the past water year. It is a little strange to consider the “operation” of a river, as we usually don’t have the opportunity to evaluate Mother Nature.  However, as a dam-controlled waterway, the Dolores River is indeed operated by the Dolores Water Conservancy District (DWCD) and the Bureau of Reclamation.

The Operations Meeting hosted by DWCD/Bureau of Reclamation Operations Committee is generally held in years when there is a “spill” or release of water from the dam because the reservoir is filled to capacity before the spring run-off has ended. 2005 was such a year. The first time the dam has spilled since 2000. Your evaluation of this year’s river operation will likely depend on your perspective.

If you were a boater watching the river level drop from 3,000 cubic feet per second (cfs) to under 1,000 cfs on Saturday night over Memorial Day weekend—you probably were unhappy with river operations. Although, overall, most boaters were ecstatic to have any water in the river after waiting 5 long years for a spill.  Irrigators were likely pleased with reservoir operations this year as the reservoir was completely full into July. Although, DWCD did not reach their target for water sales this season. Finally, if you happen to be a trout or native fish living in the Dolores River, you might be feeling pretty lonely, as your numbers continue to decline even with increased river flows this year. All of these perspectives were addressed at the meeting. 

Operating Criteria
Vern Harrell of Bureau of Reclamation opened the meeting with a summary of McPhee Reservoir Operations for 2005. His first slide turned out to be one of the most important and often overlooked aspects of river operations: the operations criteria. While these operations criteria spell out the obvious – the reservoir is operated to maximize availability of water in the reservoir for irrigation – there were some subtleties that came into play during 2005.

McPhee Reservoir Operations Criteria Summary
1) Fill the reservoir when possible.2) Do not allow the reservoir to exceed elevation 6,920 feet prior to the end of May. (Full reservoir is elevation 6,924 feet).3) Manage releases to provide white water boating opportunities, when possible.

  • Try to peak releases over Memorial Day weekend.

  • Provide a minimum raftable release of 800 cubic feet per second (cfs) as long as possible.

  • Try to limit releases to less than 4,000 cfs.

4) Provide a minimum of 2,000 cfs for seven days for channel maintenance.5) Manage releases in such a way that it is not necessary to use the emergency spillway. (Maximum release through dam outworks is 5,000 cfs).6) Managed spill releases end when reservoir inflows match the project demand. Managing a river during spring run-off is not as easy as following the operating criteria 1-2-3. 

The operations plan for any given water year begins with a runoff forecast. Forecasting runoff especially for a river as under-monitored as the Dolores, is more of an art than a science.  Bureau of Reclamation has access to some of the best forecasting tools in the US. Brenda Alcorn, a senior hydrologist from the Colorado River Basin Forecasting Center (part of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration) explained the forecasting tools used to predict runoff for the Dolores River as well as the data required to make confident predictions. She noted that “the Dolores Project is relatively new” and does not have the 30 years of historical data required to run the Water Supply Forecast model.  Alcorn and the other forecasters for the Dolores River use other models and data sets to make predictions for Dolores River runoff. These forecasts are improving with data from a new snotel (snow gauge) in Bear Creek and as each additional year of flow data are added to the historical record. There is one thing you can be sure of with forecasts – they will be wrong. And this year was no exception. While the runoff forecast predicted the total amount of runoff correctly, the water came down faster then anybody expected. The river peaked over a relatively short five day period that just happened to coincide with Memorial Day weekend. 

Memorial Day Perfect Storm
This is where the subtleties of the operating criteria come into play. Fostered by the date of runoff peak flow, reservoir elevation requirements on June first, irrigators turning on their systems, and one of the biggest boating weekends on record, a perfect storm formed over Memorial Day weekend resulting in DWCD/Bureau of Reclamation cutting the release flows in half overnight and leaving many boating parties surprised and potentially stranded in the river canyon. After an hour of discussion at the Operations meeting, it became clear what had happened. Bureau of Reclamation followed the operating criteria. This should not have been a surprise to anybody, however, several of the criteria combined to result in the dramatic drop in river flow. 

First, the inflow to the reservoir peaked on May 23 at over 5,000 cfs. Almost immediately, the inflow began dropping so that three days later it was half the peak flow and would obviously not be increasing again this season. This inflow pattern initiates the end of the spill as specified by the last of the operating criteria “spill releases end when inflows match irrigation demand”. The weather during Memorial Day weekend was beautiful, which explains why the inflow was so high – it was hot and dry and the snow in the mountains was melting fast. This weather pattern also prompted irrigators to turn on their systems because their alfalfa was starting to dry out and it was time to water. This resulted in a large increase in project demand or water being diverted out of the reservoir for irrigation. According to the operating criteria, the spill would have to be cut back so total outflow (spill + irrigation) would match the inflow. Finally, the requirement for filling the reservoir is added to the mix. 

Bureau of Reclamation keeps the reservoir four feet below full until the end of May, but on June first the reservoir should be full. With the inflow dropping fast and the reservoir still needing 16,000 acre-feet to fill, Bureau of Reclamation needed to stop outflow and fill the reservoir. All of these factors: greatly reduced inflow, greatly increased project water demand, and the need to fill the reservoir combined to cause Bureau of Reclamation to cut back on the release. The operating criteria would have allowed the Bureau to reduce the release to much lower levels, however, Harell pointed out that they did not drop the release below 800 cfs so they would not strand rafters in the canyon. Although some boaters relayed that they were essentially stranded because the drop in water level was so rapid that they woke up Sunday morning to find their boats high and dry. 

An hour of discussion and comments about river operations over Memorial Day uncovered some ways to “do it better next time”. Primarily, the solution is to improve communications between DWCD/Bureau of Reclamation and boaters. Some ideas include 1) regularly updated release forecasts that have some discussion about the confidence or uncertainty of the forecast being made; 2) adjusting the release so it is spread out over the entire month of May rather than having flows and the number of boaters peak on Memorial Day weekend; 3) a review of the implementation of the operating criteria so that Bureau of Reclamation does not have to so aggressively adjust release levels when operating criteria and inflows collude.

In this case, after cutting the release below 800 cfs and effectively ending the rafting season in early June, Bureau of Reclamation was forced to release between 600 to 800 cfs for three weeks in June because they couldn’t hold any more water in the reservoir. This ended up being “useless” flows for boaters, which would have been welcome to augment the low flows over Memorial Day weekend. 



Ranger Rick

The pace of the meeting and the mood of the group picked up considerably when BLM Ranger Rick Ryan made his presentation. As the Dolores River ranger for the past 15 years, Ranger Rick as he is known by the recreation community, was filled with fun facts and statistics about Dolores River recreational use. Using information from boating groups that registered at Bradfield Bridge, Dove Creek Pump Station, Slick Rock, and Gypsum Valley launch sites, he was able to provide some interesting helpful information about boating the Dolores River. This river season, 552 groups registered and launched on the river.  Ryan was quick to point out he has no idea how many unregistered groups launched. Most of the trips were day-trips or 3 days/2 nights in length. The majority of the river craft were classified as rafts, though there were plenty of canoes and kayaks to be found floating around. To avoid crowds at the put-in, Ryan suggested launching on Wednesday, the day of the week with the fewest registered launches. Most people did their trips over the weekends in May. People from all over the United States were rafting on the Dolores this year, although the majority of boaters (who registered) hailed from Colorado. If you wanted to catch the big whitewater, you wanted to be on the river on Wednesday May 25, when the flow hit an all-time high of 4,200 cfs.  

Comparing statistics from the 2005 boating season with the boating characteristics of the Dolores River compiled from a survey completed in 1988, Ryan found that river use is changing slightly. More people are doing day trips. This could be caused in part by a larger local boating community with easy access to the river and the relatively high flows this season that allowed boaters to blast through the canyon in a day. Overall, there are still more overnight trips recorded than day trips, making rafts, which can carry tents, food, kitchen gear, and other necessities, the foundation of the Dolores River fleet. This also explains the continued preference by Dolores River boaters to keep release levels above 800 to 1000 cfs (minimum flows needed for rafts to safely negotiate the large rapids) for as long as possible.

Lonely Fish

The evening wound down on a somber note, with the report by Colorado Department of Wildlife (DOW) fishery biologist, Mike Japhet. Japhet has been studying fish in the Dolores River for 20 years and recent trends in trout and native fish populations are alarming. Using electrofishing and other survey techniques, Japhet and other DOW biologists have recorded the number and mass of fish in the Dolores River from McPhee Dam to the confluence with the San Miguel River. They have found that since 1995, the number of trout found between McPhee Dam and Dove Creek has been in long term decline, despite, DOW’s on-going effort to stock trout in the river. At one time, the 10-mile section of river between McPhee Dam and Bradfield Bridge was classified as gold medal fishing water. The long term average and goal for trout biomass in this section of water is about 30 pounds per acre. In 2004, DOW measured 10 pounds of trout biomass per acre, and this year, they found twice that. In order to reach their goal, Japhet reported that every year, DOW stocks the Dolores River with 10,000 brown trout, 10,000 rainbow trout, and 10,000 native cutthroat trout. They will continue these efforts with greater emphasis on the native cutthroat trout. However, if river operations continue to hamper their results, Japhet implied that DOW may just give up on trying to reestablish a trout fishery on the Dolores. The low flows in the river during the past few years have obviously decimated the trout populations in once was gold medal waters. Japhet added, “For comparison, the trout biomass in the Animas River’s gold medal waters is 120 pounds per acre.” The Dolores River trout populations have a long way to go to reach gold medal status once again.

Native fish including the flannelmouth sucker, bluehead sucker, and roundtail chub are down to “precarious” numbers according to Japhet. Long term surveys, over the past 10 years, for the river section between Dove Creek and Big Gypsum launch site recorded this species as “common”. Survey results for this year found 0 flannelmouth suckers, 1 bluemouth sucker and a few roundtail chub. Furthermore, surveyors noticed only small-sized fish. This points to an unstable fish population without any large fish. Finally, Japhet observed green sunfish, a predator of roundtail chub for the first time in the river. All of these observations raise grave concerns about the future of native fish in the Dolores River.

Japhet speculated that the one cause for the crash in fish populations is related to river operations and low release levels in March. “These low flows increase water temperatures and signal to the fish to get ready to spawn, kind of like fruit trees blossoming in the spring” explained Japhet. “Then, in April we starting spilling a whole load of cold water, messing up the fishes’ spawning, just like a late freeze ruining the blossom set.” One solution, Japhet proposed would be to better mimic natural river flows. According to Japhet, one-quarter of all natural river flow occurs in March. His proposal would increase release levels in March to 100 to 200 cfs to keep the water temperatures down and delay spawning. Kent Ford, a boater from Durango, expressed support for this proposal, saying that he thought “boaters would be willing to give up some of the spill to keep fish alive in the river”.

These are the kinds of opportunities that are being discovered and evaluated by the Dolores River Dialogue (DRD). Jim Siscoe closed the meeting with an update on the current status and research being compiled by the DRD, a diverse group of farmers, boaters, environmentalists, scientists, and federal, state, and county government officials dedicated to finding better ways to operate the Dolores River. According to Siscoe, the technical committees evaluating the potential flow regimes, geomorphology, and biology of the Dolores River have completed their draft reports. The DRD will convene in January 2006 to start identifying and evaluating the opportunities that could improve the ecosystem, fishery, and recreation on the Dolores River

Prospects are good for a 2006 Operations meeting. Since the reservoir was full well into summer and irrigation water sales by DWCD were lower than expected, Harrell estimated that we will need 55 percent of normal runoff to fill the reservoir in the spring. But, just to be sure, as David Graf of DOW recommended at the end of his presentation:

Pray for Snow!

Recap of 2005 Season Reveals Lessons Learned about Reservoir Operation and Water Releases (2006 boating season was cancelled).


Attend the 2007 Dolores River Festival, June 2!
Last year we featured art, brews, food, and lots of music. Stay tuned for information about this year’s event.

Contact Susan Thomas at 970-565-7191. e-mail at
susan@sanjuancitizens.org

 

Untitled Document
     
Contact
I want to help; please keep me informed with regular updates, click here. • 10 West Main, Suite 104, • P.O. Box 1513 Cortez, CO 81321 • 970-565-7191 • e-mail