SJCA-Logo-White_trans

SJCA Guide to the

San Juan Generating Station

The economics of the San Juan Generating Station and San Juan Mine (SJGS/SJM) make no sense. It’s time for a just and orderly transition away from coal.

The San Juan Generating Station

The San Juan Generating Station and San Juan Mine complex (SJGS/SJM) is New Mexico’s single largest polluter. While the facilities provide electricity to 500,000 customers, they do so at a great cost to the health of surrounding communities and the environment.

Right now, the coal industry is struggling. As a result, the largest owner of SJGS, the Public Service Company of New Mexico (PNM) is planning to pull out of, and likely close, SJGS in 2022. The San Juan Mine, which sells coal solely to SJGS, now also faces an uncertain future.

This potential scenario is not acceptable. Closure of this complex threatens a region already reeling from the loss of oil and gas jobs. Lost royalty monies, disappearing jobs, and expensive reclamation are a likely end result.

PNM pulling out of SJGS could cripple the coal complex, leaving our community reeling in the dust; but it doesn’t have to. Right now, two planning processes, one federal and one by PNM, provide opportunities to reevaluate our energy future.

We must watchdog and engage in these processes. We must prove to our federal agencies and utility companies that we won’t settle for anything less than a just, orderly transition to a clean energy future.

Public Service Company of New Mexico (PNM)

After decades of profiting from our community’s resources, PNM could walk away from the pollution they’ve caused and the economic turmoil that follows in their wake. They have a responsibility to help facilitate a just transition, but will they fulfill it?

In April 2017, the Public Service Company of New Mexico (PNM) announced plans to close San Juan Generating Station in 2022 and replace it with other energy sources, include wind and solar. PNM is currently drafting a four year Integrated Resource Plan (IRP), which will determine what they replace power from SJGS with.

We need to engage with the IRP process and demand a clean energy future that respects the communities and workers who have turned our lights on for the last 50 years. PNM must continue to have a presence in northwest New Mexico. We expect them to retrain workers and build some of their planned renewable energy projects in our community. Sign up for our updates and we’ll keep you updated on the IRP and opportunities for engagement.

San Juan Mine Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)

For the first time ever, the Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement (OSM) is completing a comprehensive environmental analysis of the mine-mouth complex. Instead of producing another lame EIS that tries to justify the incomprehensible extension of the mine’s life we suggest they use this opportunity to face the facts: There is no future for coal.

Accepting this reality creates space for a new conversation: How do we transition away from these facilities in a just, orderly fashion? 

In the face of SJGS’s impending closure, OSM could use this opportunity to initiate the process of transition planning. OSM can lead by creating a necessary framework that ensures: worker protections, worker re-training and meaningful environmental clean up. This includes a comprehensive assessment of plant and mine contamination and coal ash waste. It also means studying beneficial uses for polluted areas, including solar installation.

In April 2017, the Public Service Company of New Mexico announced they plan to close San Juan Generating Station in 2022 and replace it with other energy sources, include wind and solar. 

Will they build these projects in the Northwest New Mexico communities that have supported them for so long? Or will they leave us in the dust?

Renewables are the cheaper future.


The coal industry is failing. 

Last year’s major coal company bankruptcies were the first major warning sign. In February 2017, the owners of the Navajo Generating Station in Arizona announced a 2019 closure date because coal is no longer profitable. In March the owner of SJGS, the Public Service Company of New Mexico (PNM), proposed closure of the plant in 2022, replacing it with wind, solar, and natural gas.

The reality is that other energy options, including renewables, are cheaper – especially in New Mexico.

New Mexico is the perfect state for renewable energy – both solar and wind. The state has the third largest solar potential in the nation, yet only ~10% of the state’s electricity is generated with renewables. Through wind and solar alone, New Mexico could easily provide PNM’s needs – several times over.

In 2016, several renewable energy projects went online in New Mexico:

  1. A 140 MW solar project in Roswell and Chavez County is the largest in the state at a cost of 3.5 – 4.2¢/kWh.
  2. Xcel Energy plans to install a 522 MW wind project in eastern NM for  2.3¢/kWh.

Currently, coal prices are around 7¢/kWh – nearly twice as expensive!

What are the impacts of SJGS and the San Juan Mine?

Take Action!

Become a member

Sign up to be a member, you’ll become an active and essential contributor to the cause.

Stay updated

Sign up for our email list here. You’ll receive the most up-to-date SJGS/SJM news and updates on new ways you can help.

Learn more

Wonder what’s happening at SJGS’s sister plant, the Four Corners Power Plant? Click here. Or check out this map for a host of other regional energy issues.

Stay Informed About San Juan Generating Station.

Optional Member Code

Recent News

Public Defends BLM Methane Rule, Again

| Oil & Gas | No Comments
The road for the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) methane waste rule has been long and winding, and unfortunately we’re not at the end. Last week, however, we threw a big wrench in Secretary Zinke’s never-ending attempts to rollback this…

Did you get your LPEA ballot?

| Climate Change, Coal, LPEA Spotlight, Oil & Gas, Renewable Energy | No Comments
Around  800 ballots were not delivered on time. If you didn't receive yours (or if you threw it away), call LPEA immediately. LPEA: (970) 247-5786 Did you vote yet?! If you buy electricity from LPEA, your ballot should have arrived  in…
Picture of sign to Counselor Chapter House

Court Finds Fracking Approvals in Greater Chaco Violate Cultural Protections

| Oil & Gas | No Comments
Over the past weekend, we had a partial win in our long fight to protect Chaco from unfettered oil and gas development. While the judge rejected our claim that the Bureau of Land Management violated the National Environmental Protection Act…
Picture of Chaco Protest June 2017

Interior Department hears resistance to energy leases

| Durango Herald Column, Oil & Gas | No Comments
Five years versus five days. That succinctly describes the different weights accorded to constituents raising objections to expanded oil and gas leasing in landscapes with special circumstances. As the Trump administration attempts to accelerate energy development through its self-described energy…